|
|
Sun
Signs.
The
earliest reference I can find to Sun Sign astrology is the book From
Pioneer to Poet by Isabelle M. Pagan published way back in 1911. It
is, however, not easy to pinpoint when Sun Sign astrology came into its
own and began the rapid expansion to what is now a multi-million pound
industry. I doubt if this was the intention of the writer, being primarily
a scholarly work for dedicated astrologers - more likely she would be
horrified at what is prevalent today.
In
all probability it all began quite innocently and seemed like a good idea
at the time yet, like the computer program designed to come up with
'interpretations', it has got out of control allowing anyone with scant
knowledge and a vivid imagination to write whatever they like and remain
unchallenged. The Sun Sign cowboys can make huge amounts of money and
assume celebrity status yet succeed
only in mongrelising the subject, lowering the standards, and deceiving
millions of people. When challenged, they run for cover or make
excuses.
Scientists
- not known for their ability to be open-minded or discerning - have
latched on to the ramblings of the Sun Sign cowboys taking this as the
real face of astrology and, using a variety of 'tests', have succeeded in
proving that astrology is utter rubbish. Now why doesn't that surprise me?
It's a classic case of the 'blind leading the blind'.
We
speak of Sun Signs as if they were entities in their own right - Gemini's
do this, Capricorns do that, etc. failing to realise that we are dealing
with the function of a planet in a Sign rather than a living person. For
example: You can say that the Sun in Cancer will equate to
certain characteristics, such as being highly emotional, imaginative, and
domesticated. What you can't say is that a Cancer person does these
things. There is no such thing as a Cancer person - or indeed any other
Sun Sign person. But, hallowed by time, the misconception persists and has
now become part of the Sun-Sign cowboys jargon.
Now
while it is true that the Sun in a particular Sign will give positive
indications as to the Solar character traits of a person, it does not show
how someone will manage their finances, run their home, or relate closely
to others. These are just the fantasies of the Sun Sign cowboys. The only way
you can know these things is to have a skilled astrologer examine your own
chart.
The
horoscopes, in particular the daily horoscopes given in magazines and
newspapers, are also largely nonsense. They depend on using the transits
of the quicker moving planets, such as the Moon, Mercury, or Venus, whose
effects are so slight as to be almost imperceptible, yet day after day
they are churned out for consumption by the gullible. Some are so vague
they could apply to anyone on any day you care to choose.
I
am not saying that Sun Sign astrology should be ignored, only that things
need to be kept in perspective and preferably out of the hands of the Sun Sign
Cowboys. By keeping the interpretations with bounds and using special
techniques for future trends they can be of use in a general sense and be
useful in stimulating people's interest. As things stand at the moment,
the whole thing is now bordering on the farcical, and as long as the
public is prepared to believe whatever goes into print the situation is
unlikely to improve.
If
you are looking for answers and a genuine, hand typed report by James
Young, look no further. Click
here.

Copyright
© 2003 First Stop Astrology.com.
All rights reserved.
|
|
Home
Page |
|
Site
Navigator |
|
More
exposures |
|
Related
subjects. |
|
Sun
Signs |
 |
|
Lucky
Numbers |
 |
|
Compatibility |
 |
|
Bogus
web sites |
 |
|
Bogus
reports |
 |
|
List
of sites |
 |
|
Bogus
tuition |
 |
|
Scam
Astrologers |
 |
|
Daft
Predictions |
 |
|
Mad
science |
 |
|
Jonathan
Cainer |
 |
|
Real
Horoscopes |
 |
|