Archives.

 Good morning.

2nd January 2008.

I have recently noticed a debate about the actual date when the Age of Aquarius begins with a wide range of possibilities being put forward, but isn't everyone missing the point here? 

An 'Age' is supposed to begin when the Spring Equinox point [formed at the intersection of the circle of the equator with the Ecliptic] moves into a constellation, in this case Aquarius. Now the boundaries of the constellations are fixed by astronomers purely for convenience; they are by no means exact - so how can we be sure were the actual boundaries are, if indeed there were any in the first place. Although it is assumed that the Zodiac was derived from the constellations this is not likely to be the case if only from the fact that that there are 12 Zodiac Signs of equal length formed  by dividing the ecliptic into 12 segments beginning at the Spring Equinox point [zero degrees Aries]. There are many constellations and they are certainly not of equal length. The names may be the same in some cases but that is more likely to be down to Astrological information being transferred to star groups, largely due to superstition rather than the other way round. 

As far as Astrology is concerned, we Astrologers do not use the constellations, and the myth spread by misguided critics that the precession of the equinox [which causes the Spring Equinox point to gradually move through the constellations] has thrown Astrology into turmoil by putting the Sun in the wrong place is just that - a myth, and a misguided one at that. Astrologers don't use the constellations and furthermore it matters not one hoot where the Spring Equinox point lies in the constellations. 

So we have no idea were the 'real' boundaries of the constellations are and it really doesn't matter where the Spring Equinox point lies anyway. Now either we are going to be guided by sound Astrology or we are going to go down the route of pure speculation. The Age of Aquarius is nonsense, so the dates are irrelevant. In any case, for those who insist it is, the Spring Equinox point still lies within the boundaries of the constellation of Pisces. 

3 January 2008. It's that time again.

Yes folks, this is the time of the year when the Sun Sign Cowboys, fakes, frauds, and scammers, will suggest that you ought to see what lies ahead this year by purchasing one of their reports, using descriptions such as 'spookily accurate', or other such come-ons. The reality is that all you will get is a cheap computer report, which quite apart from containing nothing of any value, will be inaccurate and misleading. Quite often the programs used to generate this rubbish are badly set up, which means that planets will be in the wrong place and aspects may be used which simply don't exist. The result - a waste of money. If you are really unlucky you might fall into the clutches of  outright scammers like Jenna, Sara Freder, or Pasqualina, and as a result may get nothing at all for your money!

If you really do want the best guidance then you need an individually prepared, hand typed report. You will find them on this site. 

11th January 2008. Crackpot critics. 

It has come to my attention that certain critics of Astrology are now challenging we Astrologers [especially myself] to prove that Astrology works. I haven't seen the challenges, nor am I interested in looking at them. Suffice to say that they probably contain the usual rhetoric and inaccuracies so typical of bigots. Not one of these people has risen to any of my legitimate challenges, preferring instead to sound off to their cronies rather than approach me openly. If any of them genuinely wants to know if Astrology works all they have to do is study the subject, the truth then becomes self evident. It appears that making noises is preferable to investigating with an open mind. 

14th January 2008. My reports.

Just to clarify matters. 

• All my reports are hand typed specifically for each person after careful consideration of all the relevant factors showing in their chart. I do not use computer-generated reports.

• You may ask questions before you order, on the order form, or at any time after your report has been delivered, and there is no extra charge for this - it is all part of the service. 

• On receipt of your order you will receive an acknowledgement from me giving you a delivery date. 

• If you are not certain which report is best then you can always ask and I will advise. 

Does anyone else offer a service like this? 

22 January 2008. Jenna.

Hardly a day goes by without someone contacting me regarding the antics of Jenna or asking for my advice on her report. 

These reports are computer generated in a matter of minutes and contain 'interpretations' that can be found in most books on Sun Sign Astrology. The computer program used has not been set up correctly, resulting in may inaccuracies due to incorrect planetary positions and aspects. The so called transits are pure nonsense designed to impress - the events predicted will not happen, and the implication that without her help these transits will pass you by is a downright lie. She will try very hard to extract more money from you using various ploys. Some victims have parted with a hundred dollars or more and are still no better off. 

I can't make it any plainer:

Jenna is a fake. Beware. 

Copyright ©  2003 First Stop Astrology.com. All rights reserved.